Posted by knorby on March 15, 2009 under internet, twitter | 
I read an interview with Stephen Fry on the BBC, which seemed to respond nicely to a few of my problems with twitter that I posted about, at least for some. He points out that, on the whole, media really don’t like twitter that much. If he wants to make an announcement, he just does it, and people find it; he doesn’t have to go through a swarm of interviews, which is why the media hates it. I have to admit, I am a lot more interested in public figures as a result of twitter than I ever was before, and if I did care, I probably would stick to twitter rather than the more traditional infotainment channels.
I suppose if I cared more about spoken langauge, writing, etc… I could appreciate how 140 or so characters was an interesting change to language. I guess my problem is really understanding why it matters in the first place. Much bothers me about SMS (more to do with price gouging than anything else), so it might just be my distrust of anything based off of SMS.
Posted by knorby on March 3, 2009 under media, twitter |
Recently, I have noticed quickly accelerate its rise into the mainstream, which I have mostly found annoying. It is a simple idea; the main achievement of twitter is to gain a rather large user base and make and maintain a fair number of contracts for sms; too much credit is given to it. Here are my thoughts on it:
- The media needs to shut the hell up about it. Facebook too. I have seen/heard far too many stories where some reporter is just utterly fascinated by it (really, there is nothing there) or they just spout gibberish, highlighting their ignorance. Just shut up! This isn’t news. If you want to use it, use it. Otherwise don’t.
- Twitter is 140 characters so you can fit in both a username and message in an SMS message. There isn’t much difference between writing tweets and an SMS message. So shut up about it.
- Please, set up a twitter account if you have a business or are someone famous and awesome, but I care more about what my friends are saying than your tweets, so keep the traffic low. If you hired an intern to do nothing but tweet, they should focus on replies, or you will lose followers. Seriously.
- If you want to livetweet, get a separate account for it, for the reason I named above. Maybe your twitter client can filter, but most can’t, and it is just really annoying to have to go too far back in my friend’s timeline to see anything of worth.
- Don’t use twitters for polls, media. You get like 30 responses and publish the results anyway. That is a sure sign that no one cares. I haven’t seen these in anything worthwhile (the chicago red eye for example), so I guess I can’t be too surprised.
- Twitter seriously needs to get its shit together. I don’t understand why they are so content to get VC and make no attempts to make money, since it would be so simple to just put google ads up. I don’t think anyone would care.
- Spend some time on the damn website. I don’t think there is any twitter software now that doesn’t beat the website, which is just stupid. Even something like the twitter gadget (google widget, so you can use it in gmail) has plenty more features than the standard site now. Hash tags have been around for a while, but there isn’t any clear support for them, beyond the standard search. I don’t think twitter even bothers to convert links to tinyurl or similar services anymore, which should have always been better anyway. Filtering should be added in, etc… If twitter wanted to add in ads down the line, they would have a hard time getting people to use the web interface. When I started using it, the service was much more feature rich, and those have been removed over time (fucking fail whale). Just get your damn act together.
I might write up some more in the future.
Posted by knorby on December 1, 2008 under Python, internet |
I was in need of a break from work, so I finally got around to implementing DOIT of the Day on twitter! For those not familiar with DOIT jokes, they are a set of jokes from USENET, or even before that. A while ago, I started maintaining a fortune database, which I wrote about here. I haven’t gotten around to packaging it up for various Linux distros yet, but I will eventually. So, you can now get your daily fill of DOIT jokes from twitter. Non-twitters can DOIT with RSS.
I wrote a couple of python script/libraries to auto-follow followers (CPAN was having some problems, so I didn’t use a perl script someone else had already written) and a fortune->twitter script. I will clean those up at some point soon and put them up somewhere.
Posted by knorby on July 3, 2008 under humor, internet |
Twitterfeed got me thinking. How long could I get a twitter-twitterfeed infinite recursion loop to go for? I created the infinatwit to put that question to the test by setting twitterfeed to follow infinatwit and post to infinatwit. I think the next step will be to see how many web 2.0 services I can combine to produce this effect. I think feedburner is next…
