As one of the administrators for the ACM mailing list, I am used to dealing with a lot of spam at this point. Even with spam filtering, it used to be pretty terrible, until we made it more aggressive. Of course, none was going out to the list; it was really a difference between spam to review and spam that is auto-deleted. Mailman sucks, so my inbox gets filled with a lot of the bounces, which gmail spam filtering can handle nicely, but a select few can still get through. Spam is one of the most pointless things I can imagine, but at the very least, it usually includes a link, or some sort of ad. I got the same spam message a couple of times that didn’t quit follow that convention:

Subject: best
your life is crap

There were at two different from addresses and names, so it was pretty clear it was spam. The only purpose I could see to something like this spam is to reply back, desperate for answers. Maybe they were writing some huge long spam and hit send by accident a little too early, or there spam creation software sucks. What a strange piece of spam….

The ACM (just Borja really) organized a trip to Google Chicago, where all of the Google Summer of Code students who were accepted from UChicago (and in the US) gave lightening talks on our projects, which included me. The other GSoC students were Marcus Westin, Jordon Lewis, and Nick Edds. I put up my talk, as well as a more general page for my project on my CS site. Marcus and I both have projects with the Globus Alliance, so I was quite happy that he went before me, as I didn’t have to explain what Globus is. My project is fairly straight foreword to explain and I still don’t know the Globus Toolkit (GT) that well, so I couldn’t answer too many questions, and I ended up going under in time. Everyone seemed most interested in Nick’s project, since it is on the 2to3 tool in python, and a decent amount of the audience used Python, some with a great deal of dedication (it was at Google after all). I am pretty excited to see how Nick’s project turns out; we both went to the talk that his mentor, Collin Winter, gave at PyCon on the tool and the issues that Nick is working to fix.
The Chicago office’s engineering crew is dominated by subversion developers (in the small selection of software I like), but most of the presentations were about most unrelated projects. Ben Collins-Sussman discussed a VM for interactive fiction games like zork (I’ll still play my zork on the SDF TWENEX Machine; the version of zork installed is from 1981!). Karl Fogel, not a current Google developer, but subversion developer and good friend of the other googlers, gave a talk on script he wrote to help track patches from non-core developers based on logs. He put up some stats on the differences between subversion and GNU Emacs as projects; it further straightened my reasoning for using XEmacs. I went to a Russian choir concert the night before, as I had to go to a concert from a genre I don’t have any familiarity with, which he apparently was in; what a small world I live in. Brian Fitzpatrick gave a shortened version of the keynote he have at PyCon on balancing functional complexity with usability in software. Like all the other talks I have heard him give, it was an excellent talk; he has one of the best uses of slide shows I have seen, and I always end up thinking about the talks much later. There was also a talk from a developer for Blogger (he said he was now on feedburner); I would give his name, but I can’t remember it at the moment. I talked to him for a bit; I think my social awkwardness was in full swing at the time. I asked him about something I read on Valleywag about Google adding some preference search rankings with Blogger (I can’t find the post at the moment; I will link to it if I do); as I am sure is the case, he said that Google does no such evil. He also mentioned that Google crawls its own site with the same bot, which makes sense, but I hadn’t thought about it before. I wish I knew Blogger better, as I used it once for something else and had a couple thoughts about its workings.
It was a fairly awesome evening. I was very sleep deprived after one of my harder weeks here, so I was defintely in a strange state for the entirity of the thing. My thanks and appretiation go out to Borja and Google for this event. Apparently, my glorious face might end up on the GSoC blog or the Google open source blog.

I wrote this “eulogy” for two computers that apparently got fried (as in electrical surge or something) recently in the Maclab. I intended it for fellow tutors, but I was fairly fond of it. It would probably help to know that these computers were named “python” and “ada.”

We are gathered here today to mourn the deaths of Python and Ada. They lived good, long lives as G5s. Tragically, Brian discovered their charred remains yesterday, which was confirmed today.

Ada always dreamed of being a missile guidance system, but as a G5, it was never able to fulfill its dream. It forgot its dream, and instead spent its life running word, with the occasional bit of matlab and powerpoint here and there. As it felt its final death blow surge, it visualized tracking a laser point until meeting a glorious, explosive end, it quietly whispered “I’m going home!”

Python suffered a far more tragic death. Realizing it was at its final moments, it began to question the meaning of it all:

>>> raw_input(”So this is it? Was it good? Why do I have to die? Where
I am going?”)
So this is it? Was it good? Why do I have to die? Where I am
going?Traceback (most recent call last):
File ““, line 1, in ?
EOFError

Unfortunately, its questions were left unanswered:

>>> raise UnboundLocalError, “Oh Noes!!!!”
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ““, line 1, in ?
UnboundLocalError: Oh Noes!!!!
>>> raise SystemExit
$

Unfortunately, no one was there to catch its exception.